Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.

Essay topics:

Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.

Since courses like Humanities do not provide any benefit for the future career of a Business or Science background student, must be avoided.

Courses like humanities do not have any implication for the career of business or science background students. Every second of life is important, so there is no point spending precious time of undergraduate life in studying social science type courses. At the same time, for a business and science background student there is no point in spending money by taking unnecessary course like humanities. Those courses does not provide any knowledge which are going to be needed in the future career of a businessman or engineer or doctor. So, those courses should never be included in the course curriculums of business or science students. For example, A student studying civil engineering must complete around 160 credit in four year of his undergraduate life. Since, Analytical Mechanics, Surveying, Fluid Mechanics, Materials, Structures are the subjects which have direct implication on their upcoming future career, a vast knowledge about those subjects is necessary. However, social science type courses do not have any implication in the career of a civil engineer. Students show reluctance on subjects when they know that certain topics has no practical implication in their lives. Such reluctance force them to avoid studying those subjects and as results are not independent of those subjects, the CGPA of students thus become affected. However, if the curriculum avoids those subjects and includes core subjects of civil engineering then students will become more attentive and their result will become good.

In the case of a banker, knowledge of accounting and business related topics are a must. So study curriculum should be designed in such a way that after completing graduation a student will become a good banker. Similarly, for students who are going to start up new business immediately after graduation, study curriculum of them should be such that they become a successful businessman. Unnecessary courses are not going to help them in their career and should be avoided.

However, it is true that since an engineer, a doctor, a banker all lives in a society and their professions make them to deal with people directly. Based on this fact it may appear true that certain humanities courses should be included in the curriculum to impart human properties into the students. But, it is also true that human properties can not be imparted into a person by mere some courses, however, those are the properties which need time and are imparted to a person starting from the childhood. So, certain courses cannot make a inhuman person social.

Undergraduate course curriculum of business or science students should not include humanities.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-23 jason123 83 view
2020-01-08 abirtanaz242 50 view
2019-12-12 bstergios55@yahoo.com 79 view
2019-12-10 Ruchi14 50 view
2019-12-10 qwer_ty 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Lutfor Rahman Rony :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'do'.
Suggestion: do
...y course like humanities. Those courses does not provide any knowledge which are goi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ldhood. So, certain courses cannot make a inhuman person social. Undergraduate ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, then, thus, for example, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24276169265 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82923197155 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440979955457 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3615690154 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.095238095 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.380952381 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400324843259 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140611822584 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102253536861 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272135519032 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891235994398 0.0667264976115 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.