Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student field of study
University courses are the ones that provide a student comprehensive learning. A learning that can be used in the real world by the student to solve certain problems. In this the author claims that university should make the rule for the student to take variety of courses outside their field of study. I strongly oppose this view due to certain below-mentioned reasons.
First, the student have taken certain field as per what interest them and they are passionate about that. Now if the university forces them to choose any course outside their field of study in which they have no interest. Then they will just choose the course for the sake of passing and will not acquire any useful learning from that course. This can eventually lead to wastage of resources and time for the university and students.
Secondly, if student would have given the permission to choose any course and they choose the course which totally differ from their field of study then it will not become beneficial for them. For example, if student of computer science choose a subject of law then it is not going to be beneficial for them in the future. Thus, giving student a free hand to choose whatever course out of that field add no value to students’ knowledge.
Third, if student choose the course for which the university did not have any faculty placed than it can occur an extra cost for university to hire that field faculty. Also, if the number of students opting for that particular course are few than it would be wastage of resources for the university. For example, there are many students in one class now if everybody had chosen different course out of their field of study than university will have to hire new faculty. In this case if number of students per subject are less than a few then it worthless to teach that course.
One can argue that the student who choose the course out of their study field can gain complete knowledge of everything and help them to became better person. We can agree to this up to some extant because there are some social subjects from which student can get information about how to become a better person. But, to give complete freedom to choose whichever subject they want can bring wastage of resource and time.
We can conclude that author claims of university to make a rule for student to learn a course out of their study field will not be helpful for the student. The university should made proper list of course which they offer every semester which contains subjects that is out of their field study, but make some linkage. Students should require to opt a subject from that pool which can provide some linkage to their major study. This can benefit students to get knowledge of other field and make them better all-rounder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-30 | jaypatel31 | 58 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student field of study 58
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
- Some people think that teachers and educational professionals should make all of the important decisions about what subjects are taught in schools Others think that business and industry professionals should make all of the major decisions 73
- Some students prefer to live on campus in a dormitory and some others prefer an apartment or a house at off campus 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A student must like a teacher in order to learn from the teacher 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had given'?
Suggestion: had given
... and students. Secondly, if student would have given the permission to choose any course and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thus, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74226804124 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35298658312 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.39793814433 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.614483676 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0454545455 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41276721908 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148722833499 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102552637905 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251290097089 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884303588281 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.