Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Students make a choice of the fields in which they wants to persue their career while entering the college. Colleges could play a major role in driving a students to their path of success. In this, the author claims that university should prevent the student from pursuing fields of the study in which they are less likely to be succeeded. I disagree with this claim due to certain below-mentioned reasons.
First, what are the factor that universities should take into account while making such decisions plays major role. If student had selected any branch then they would have selected on the basis of their interests. Now, if university had to prevent them from taking that decision then there would be certain factors which were likely to be assessed by the university before taking such decisions. Now the factor could be the academic perfomance of the student which shows that students are less likely to succeed in this branch, but university cannot rely solely on this factor taken into consideration. For example, Founder of Microsoft Bill Gates got very pover grades in the field of his study which was related to computer, but as we can see he was the one who brought revolution in the field of computer. So, the factor on which the students get assessed plays major role in such decisions.
Further more, there can be other social reasons which would indicate that the students are unlikely to be succeeded in their fields of study. But making decision based on such social reasons will clearly be considered inappropriate. For example, a student is not able to perform in the field of their study due to some finacial reasons but this does not define that student have no interest in the field of their study or student is not likely to be succeeded in their career. So, there can be some social problem related to student which would be hampering their perfomace and to take decision on such basis would be inappropriate.
In addition to this, students is not performing better in their field of choice because they are not getting proper knowledge from their professor. In this case if the university decide to prevent students from continuing their fields of study then it cannot be justified. For example, students are getting pover grade because the faculties are not properly transfering knolwedge to the students and not that student does not have interest in their fields. So, this also can be the case for the students to not perform up to the mark in their field of study.
One can argue that if student who had no interest in the field they are studying should be prevent before it is too late and preventing them to destroy their life. Now we can accept this argument up to on extanct but there would be very less number of students who pursue the field in which they are not inerested. So, for this small majority of student to impose a general rule would lead to several wrong decisions which can negatively impact the student's career.
Thus, we can conclude that the author's argument can be followed for the certain cases but not generally. The combine effort from the students and the university can always lead to the path of success for the students. It would be better if they could dig why a particular student is not perfoming up to the mark and try to understand their reason and eliminate it to make better path for the students in their journey of success.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- Some students prefer to live on campus in a dormitory and some others prefer an apartment or a house at off campus 73
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 62
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'want'
Suggestion: want
...ke a choice of the fields in which they wants to persue their career while entering t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...eges could play a major role in driving a students to their path of success. In this, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...making such decisions plays major role. If student had selected any branch then th...
^^
Line 9, column 92, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevented'?
Suggestion: prevented
...n the field they are studying should be prevent before it is too late and preventing th...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...reer. Thus, we can conclude that the authors argument can be followed for the certai...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2820.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 592.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76351351351 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93265142912 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44937558194 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.369932432432 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0454938078 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275368259185 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105331389586 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735014113792 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182284684649 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507528801537 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.