Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
No one can gainsay that students should make their best efforts when they are taught in a university to help them to get a good occupation or achieve their dream down the road. Indisputably, some individuals are in the opinion that students have to focus on one specific major in consideration with the limited timeline of university courses. However, not everyone agrees on such position. There are certainly cases that taking different courses from their major can help students to understand the majer deeply and to be open to various job positions but also to cultivate them as a prepared electorate.
First and foremost, there are certainly persuasive reasons that students should concentrate on one major study. This is mainly due to the fact that they are given limited time to cover a variety of course works. If they study an advanced math and also have to deal with art history that requires considerable amount of time to grasp as well, they may not fully comprehend neither math nor art history and could have low grades in both. Similarly, learning many subjects can be too burdensome for a student to bear. Their major can be highly convoluted to apprehend and may require to spend a great deal of time and focus. Taking various subjects are to lay another heavy burden on students’ shoulders, which might deteriorate their emotional, phychological, and physical health. Therefore, people believe that students ought to devote themselves to mastering one specific subject considering the limited timeframe and their stress of students.
However, what was alluded to above should not be overgeneralized to all context. Alongside those disadvantages, there are certainly benefits of taking multiple courses in a university. Firstly, students can expand their understanding in diverse areas of study, which in turn facilitates their academic acheivements in their major. For instance, computational science encompasses all of math, physics, and engineering, so that a student who have an inclusive comprehension on all the subjects may have the upper hand to do well in computational science. Secondly, a student may be able to broaden their choice of job in the future, after they take multiple course. As a vivid example, a student who finds another interest in camera shooting in their elective courses but majors in math is able to change his or her future career. As seen in above examples, taking various courses can make students do well in their academic performance but also provide chance to students to open the spectrum of job choices.
In addition, if a student get other courses other than their major, they will be more prepared electorate when they engage in many different policy making. For instance, we have to make a choice in social science, ethnic conflicts, science or engineering as we dwell on a society. If we are equipped with the knowledge and understanding of each area, this can help us to vote for the best solutions to a problem. Hence, the policy that student should take various elective courses can benefit educating people to provie the best solutions in policy-making.
To sum up, there is no denying the fact that students’ focusing on one major course helps students to spend more time in their major and expand their knowledge and reduce their burdent on studying. However, there are certainly advatanges of taking multiple courses, such as comprehensive understanding, opening student’s choice for a job, and cultivating students to be ready for policy-making. Therefore, we should aim to develop more diverse courses that students can relish different aspects of studies in which they do not major and develop their knwoldege and usefulness as a citizen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | sunpeach | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Daffodilia | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Gaurav Singla | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | loquats | 66 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer. 66
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of w 82
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children’s schools. 54
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
...convoluted to apprehend and may require to spend a great deal of time and focus. Taking ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...prepared electorate when they engage in many different policy making. For instance, we have to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3131.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91735220983 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457095709571 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 998.1 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1943047411 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.24 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.24 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.32 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209831948038 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715801764299 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348339200721 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140449198284 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222169993454 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 100.480337079 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.