Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some universities nowadays encourage their students to acquire more knowledge outside their field of study, as it’s important for them to have a successful career in the future. In my point of view, I agree that students should take disparate courses which seem to be irrelevant with their major to develop their critical and creative thinking ability.
One of the reasons students are reluctant to learn things outside their majors is that they have been put too much pressure on their field of study. With the fierce competition in colleges, students pay more attention to the academic work related to their majors. Some of them even work late at night especially in the testing season. Under such a circumstance, it is unrealistic for them to spare time and effort to receive education in other areas. If they make the decision to take part in courses or activities outside their fields, they should bear the consequences of being left behind by their peers in professional works.
However, taking courses outside students’ major has its unique merits which could benefit a lot to students. Globalisation has made a huge contribution to the prosperity of world’s economy and it will continue to do so. In the meanwhile, this trend also makes globalised companies to hire staff who are capable to do different types of work, such as marketing plan and engineering related work. As a result, People with various job skills become more competitive in the job market. How can people acquire various knowledge? I think learning different kinds of things in the college is the best opportunity to enhance personal abilities, as universities have many resources, such as libraries, speeches given by celebrities and professional teachers, to provide knowledge in disparate majors.
Moreover, the learning process outside students’ own majors enables them to think things in a more comprehensive way. Most arguments nowadays result from people’s inability to think critically, as they don’t have a knowledge system to figure out things that are complicated. For example, environmental activists may only concern the environmental outcomes of certain economic activities, while company owners only care about their profits when operating a firm. If they both have known about the importance of environmental protection and economic prosperity, they may think differently and reach a balance between environment and company operation.
In conclusion, although courses outside students’ field of study may affect their academic work, it is still necessary for them to attend activities and courses in other areas, because they can be well prepared for the future employment and become wiser people to avert biases towards things they are not familiar with.
- The following appeared as part of a promotional campaign to sell advertising space in the Daily Gazette to grocery stores in the Marston area:"Advertising the reduced price of selected grocery items in the Daily Gazette will help you increase your sales. 60
- TPO 2 3
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 94
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 54
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 62
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261477045908 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.141716566866 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0998003992016 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0359281437126 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.063872255489 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.127744510978 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0259481037924 0.0406280797675 64% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96697078794 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0439121756487 0.030933414821 142% => OK
Particles: 0.00199600798403 0.0016655270985 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.0578842315369 0.0997080785238 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179640718563 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119760479042 0.0148568991511 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2791.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.38672768879 6.0361032391 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.407322654462 0.366273622748 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.327231121281 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224256292906 0.200843997647 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162471395881 0.132149295362 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96697078794 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558352402746 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 66.4249803774 55.4138127331 120% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2777777778 23.380412469 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.791102254 59.4972553346 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.055555556 141.124799967 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 23.380412469 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.674092028746 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 57.0008899059 51.4728631049 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.71900826446 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401205832643 0.391690518653 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114720397547 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0601250757687 0.077325440228 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523741634315 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18535489404 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158838370141 0.161403998019 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669838599796 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.362111281297 0.385218514788 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0812325674938 0.0692045440612 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275641938329 0.275328986314 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515099200623 0.0653680567796 79% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.