Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Universities should allow students to take courses that do not match their field of study. The world is becoming competitive, and because of this, people are required to learn more and gain more knowledge. Along with this, technology is growing at an accelerated rate and one cannot survive with knowledge only in field. Also, having knowledge in more courses opens up more career opportunities.
As I said earlier, the World is becoming highly competitive, and naturally, the one with more skill will triumph over the one with lesser technical skill. To further substantiate my point, I would like to make a comparison between my father and my uncle. Both of them studied Mechanical Engineering, but my uncle also did a course in Electronics Engineering, whereas my father stuck only to mechanical engineering. Once they obtained their degrees, they were employed in a renowned company that specialized in air conditioners. My father struggled to understand the working of electronic equipment such as sensors and thermistors, whereas my uncle, well versed in the electronics field, rose quickly through the ranks from being a worker to a supervisor. My dad decided to quit his job and work as a petty mechanic, managing to earn only a few dollars everyday. Thus, in order to gain a competitive edge, one must be multifarious in technical skills and must be allowed to take multiple courses.
Being well-versed in multiple courses increases the scope of one's technical skill and thus opens up a door of opportunities. I would like to state my own self as an example. I completed two engineering courses: Mechanical and Electrical engineering. I got placed in a company that required me to have sophisticated skill in electrical engineering, but unfortunately, I lacked the ability because electrical engineering is a dangerous field. I had to quit my job, and luckily, due to me having a variety of options due to having done multiple courses, I was placed in a mechanical-based company, and was much more comfortable in doing work.
Due to advancing technology, one must be knowledgeable. Many devices and components have started to incorporate technology from other fields. For example, the automobile sector was a purely mechanical sector until 10 years ago. But now, electronics such as speed sensors and temperature sensors have become an integral part in determining how an automobile will run. Thus, considering today's circumstances, one cannot expect to ace in the field of automobile only with pure mechanical-based knowledge. He must have knowledge in the field of both electronics and mechanical engineering.
Some will argue that students who have multiple courses and subjects imposed on themselves will struggle to finish even one of them. I would like to counter their point by saying that by practice, even the dumbest person can become a genius in anything he chooses to. Initially, I had a lot of trouble in learning because I was getting confused with electronics and mechanical engineering, but, with diligence and continuous practice, I overcame my restrictions and aced in both fields.
A few people will again be in opposition to the idea of being multifarious because they consider learning several courses to be a waste of money. While it may appear right from their viewpoint, it is not. We spend and throw away money in several ways. A connection should not be made between education and money. Nonetheless, there are several colleges that offer multiple free courses or courses at extremely low fees to their students.
Thus, I would like to conclude by saying that in order to survive in this competitive world, gain extra knowledge and expand his/her career scope, one must take and learn courses not related to his field of interest.
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 16
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 853, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ic, managing to earn only a few dollars everyday. Thus, in order to gain a competitive e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... Mechanical and Electrical engineering. I got placed in a company that required m...
^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rical engineering is a dangerous field. I had to quit my job, and luckily, due to...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2206095791 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.168359941945 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0827285921626 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0537010159652 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0638606676343 0.0444667217837 144% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.11175616836 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0478955007257 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0629663835 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0406386066763 0.030933414821 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00145137880987 0.0016655270985 87% => OK
Determiners: 0.0638606676343 0.0997080785238 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0290275761974 0.0249443105267 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00870827285922 0.0148568991511 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3779.0 2732.02544248 138% => OK
No of words: 617.0 452.878318584 136% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12479740681 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.58838876751 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369529983793 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.290113452188 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207455429498 0.200843997647 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.150729335494 0.132149295362 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0629663835 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 219.290929204 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479740680713 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 59.3538147335 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6194690265 150% => OK
Sentence length: 19.9032258065 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9555890175 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.903225806 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9032258065 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.387096774194 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 48.9145710253 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.32994923858 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22863064877 0.391690518653 58% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0897578441944 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0856445654816 0.077325440228 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.459804453436 0.547984918172 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147519005513 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764594117771 0.161403998019 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052190673953 0.0892212321368 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.299865761228 0.385218514788 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.084422626348 0.0692045440612 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142936226157 0.275328986314 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287480563037 0.0653680567796 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 24.0 13.5995575221 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.