As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
To begin with, The more knowledge we learn the more complex we can solve. It is easy to take the astronomical field into account. With getting more knowledge, people are more curious about unknowing things. Mars is a good illustration of this viewpoint. So mysterious a red planet as to fascinate us. To realize this obsessing planet, we accelerate technology development so fast that we can get more unknowing things on Mars, solving more mysteries. In a word, When we getting more knowledge, things do not become mysterious.
Again, we can consider that will technology development make things complex? The answer is no. Improving technology development brings such more knowledge for us that we can recognize the world. For example, Newton, the famous English mathematician and physicist, established classical mechanics to realize how the world operates. Through classical mechanics, we can solve more complex problems in the world, recognizing the world. In brief, with more knowledge, we can solve more complex problems in the world.
Further, we focus on the medical field, and we can find the same result as above. With more realizing the patient’s physiological traits and psychological problems, more illnesses can be solved by people. Covid-19 is a good example of this viewpoint. Even though this brutal virus has killed many people in the world, science takes so great pains to research the virus and develop vaccines to solve this pandemic. In recently, the casualty rate has been slowing down. In sum, when we acquire more knowledge, we could make more things clear.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-01 | wexoc | 50 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi 50
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, as to, for example, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82132945654 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.092831064 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3157894737 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4736842105 23.4991977007 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482648093872 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161757517689 0.0831039109588 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160565229316 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355212363 0.150359130593 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101713764291 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, as to, for example, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 2235.4752809 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 256.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21875 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82132945654 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.092831064 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3157894737 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.4736842105 23.4991977007 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.47368421053 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482648093872 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161757517689 0.0831039109588 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160565229316 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355212363 0.150359130593 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101713764291 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.