We can usually learn much more from people whose view we share than from people whose views contradict our own.” Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.”
There are different views on whether we gain more benefits from those having similar ideas or from those who have different opinions which contradict our own. I believe that we can benefit from two groups of people. Also, I claim that sometimes disagreements are necessary, and they do not necessarily cause stress or other negative outcomes.
On the one hand, I can explain why we can learn from people who have similar views. Most of the time people share their views in order to help others in different fields according to their knowledge and experience. Sharing information can cause people to improve their skills. Individuals usually like to share their experiences and knowledge with like-minded people, as they think that such people see the world from the same perspective. For example, when someone wants to run a business like to get help from those who agree with self-business and have enough work experience. If he finds such people, he will be more motivated to know about the problems ahead of him and to accept the proposed solutions and methods. Also, most of the time, people with common interests and similar views can better understand each other, as they share their knowledge as a friend and try to resolve their problems.
However, having similar views and opinions sometimes can also be counterproductive to learning because people with the same views usually have similar weak points. Most of the time disagreements originates from different ideas. For instance, someone wants to have his own business. Some of his friends agree with his idea just because they have the same interest but other friends disagree because they believe that the person considered does not have the necessary features for running a business. In this situation, the second group of friends try to keep the person aware of the weaknesses he has and help him to choose the correct way. However, whether or not all disagreements are acceptable. Absolutely no, sometimes people oppose just because they want to impede others' progress. For example, in my country, many women are deprived of similar opportunities provided to men because of disagreements between officials, as some of them think that women are not the same as men and that their level should be lower than their male counterparts. This type of disagreement has negative consequences and cannot help people to progress in their lives. Such disagreements can cause outrage and increase stress among people as they want to defend their rights.
In conclusion, in my view, we can learn from all people whether they have different ideas or have the same ones. Additionally, conflicts or disagreements can have both positive and negative outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...him to choose the correct way. However, whether or not all disagreements are acceptable. Absol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09438202247 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73693104895 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1839937395 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.045454545 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335256826078 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113658234217 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908327881773 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248191319904 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451981588097 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.