We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
From the first educated generations to a famous song writer that came up with the line “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”, it was believed that struggling has always been for a reason. Indeed, a learning process has never been an easy path and I am sure that many people would agree with the following statement : either a person’s goal is learning a new language, preparing for a test or understanding reasons behind a recent break-up, a learned lesson has (almost) never been associated with the words “enjoy”, “success” or an expression “enjoy success”. Therefore, I am prone to believe that there exist several arguments that refrain me from supporting the written statement.
First of all, a lesson cannot be learned without understanding one’s own limitations. For instance, when a child begins to learn how to read, he or she needs to go through several steps toward reaching the ultimate goal, namely learning the letters and pronunciations and differentiating between letter “a” in the word “cat” and “cable”. Thus, the former limitation, i.e. inability to overcome the above-stated tasks as opposed to an ultimate feeling of accomplishment was the key motivator toward reaching the goal, since the goal would not be reached without consciously realizing one’s own limitations.
In addition to this statement, the entire definition of the word “learning” is challenged when it is connected to the “enjoyment of success”. “To learn is to suffer” has been an old saying of ancient philosophers and such a contradiction would imply that when we feel good, we learn a valuable lesson? A human life would be less sophisticated if the strict disagreement with ancient philosophies would be the right thing to do. this disagreement would mean that children can stop making parents’ mistakes by simply listening to their advice. it would also imply that once succeeding on a test, a student will “learn a valuable lesson” and pass all other similar tests. As tempting as it could be, humanity’s constant seeking for an answer will never stop until people stumble and fall, rising again.
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities. 66
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
- Because society is always changing, laws should always change to reflect the times as well. In addition, laws should be open to interpretation based on the facts of each individual circumstance. 66
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown. 16
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your posit
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...es by simply listening to their advice. it would also imply that once succeeding o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5261627907 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.59787797152 2.79657885939 129% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613372093023 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.5813907174 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.416666667 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941868420173 0.243740707755 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464038922508 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379678944424 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737007267836 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431957465522 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.39 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.