The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
No nation can thrive in the environment of disturbance and chaos where everybody has the right to point his/her immediate leaders, elders or authority without any proper channel and laws.
The society can survive and grow when adhered to laws and live with respect and trust on the elected leaders. Nations should maintain the environment of trust and serenity in their country, because if they lose their tempers and stand against the elected government, the whole country will be outrageously affected. Think of a country with pathetic disorder. Everybody is abusing the leaders, protesting and demanding to withdraw. What would be the consequences? The whole society will collapse with the dissolved government. There will be the chance of marshal law. The integrity of the country will be at stake. The foreign aids and relationships will be abandoned. And most importantly, the country can face the economic gloom which could lead the nation to slavery. Hence, nation's success is hidden in the trustful and law abiding culture.
The similar rule applies at more deeper level, inside families, schools, organizations etc: If any child do not obey his/her parents, and instead, behaving egregiously, if instead of following their teacher's advice, students start abusing them, similarly, if the employees do not obey the norms and rules of the organization, what are the end results? The society can not even survive. Therefore, everybody should obey their authorities and abide by the laws.
However, the nation should have a right to ask their leaders, and in extreme cases, could even sue them, but through proper channel and laws. Similarly, children could point out parents' mistakes, but respectfully. And students could question their teachers, but politely.
In short, nations can not grow and cultivate in the unprincipled culture, where everybody has a right to pin point the mistakes of their leaders/elders, but through appropriate norms and channels.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 59
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as 66
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 45
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'deeper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: deeper
...culture. The similar rule applies at more deeper level, inside families, schools, organi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Therefore, everybody should obey their authorities and abide by the laws. Ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35691318328 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78488150117 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540192926045 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 79.5367125462 60.3974514979 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6842105263 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0595066270829 0.243740707755 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252738742541 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244502412868 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0222046147785 0.150359130593 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331902696231 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.