The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Society can be broadly be divided into two strata – people in power and the ordinary multitude. The general public elect their representatives to formulate laws for a better well off living, and hence, it becomes the fundamental right of the people to question the authorities and be heard and answered.
The Government is an intricate, multi-layered highly functioning complex body whose fundamental duty is to cater to the well-being of the society at large. However, the government often fails to notice issues which might not be as significantly important in its functioning as it is to the society. It is at this juncture where the interests of the people in authority supersedes that of the society. Without the proper instruments of asking questions and channelizing doubts to the authority, what follows are protests, vandalism and destruction of state property, as seen when Government tries to hide figures during inflation, economic depressions, natural calamity or world-wide pressing phenomenon. Hence, with proper questioning, both parties can mitigate pressing problems and enhance mutual well-being.
The society will benefit at large when people question the political machinery – the efficient voting system, what changes the current ruling party are aiming at, fund allocations for a new financial year, changes in tax structures and the market economy, trade relations and ties between different countries, how effective the defence systems are or whether the nation is prepared for an impending nuclear strike. Undoubtedly, people will develop a sense of security and trust on the current Government if their questions hinted at the legal system –whether justice is imparted equally to all and the efficiency of implementation of human rights, are effectively answered. The consistent pressurization by the people has led to the formulation of Right to Information (RTI) act, or the setting up of consumer forum associations. Questions regarding the safety of women, having been around for several decades, have stirred up the Government to pass the woman rights bill. Thus, people stand to benefit when they question authority.
No Government can function without the support of the people, and hence, the common mass constitute the most important parameter of any governance, and answering questions and grievances form the fundamental duty of the authority. Often there are issues to which the public should not be aiming questions at, as it would violate the efficient running of a nation. However, society stands to gain when people actively participate in issues such embracing education policies, or technological progress and art after they question the prevailing education system, the advancements in technology and science, the Government’s contribution to art and culture, and effectiveness of the allocation of funds to various domains. In India, questioning the authority about the inefficient mid-day meal quality in various schools have been answered by efficient allocation of funds to the states and better regulation of food quality. Active participation of people, thus, is deemed necessary for a well-off life.
The advantages of questioning the authority are manifold. People will have clearer views of the political functioning and the legal and social activities of the Government. A greater understanding will enhance greater participation of the people in concord the Government. This will help people to direct their grievances against certain unsatisfactory practises or suggest changes to already incorporated laws. Suggestions and opinions from the common people will help the authorities to cater to the interest of the society in a better manner. Moreover, there are possibilities of newer outcomes and ideas from people which the Government can embrace. Questions can be raised against inefficient practices, corruptions and scandals which often plague the governance, and efficient solutions and actions can be sought.
Hence, indubitably the society stands to benefit when questions are raised. For a betterment of the people at large, it is advisable on the people’s part to question and encourage questions and foster curiosity about the governance.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 83
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limi 59
- Formal education at every society has certain responsibility to rear students in a right way in order to become appropriate members of society. 58
- In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years. 58
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n power and the ordinary multitude. The general public elect their representatives to formulat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 38.0 12.9106741573 294% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3599.0 2235.4752809 161% => OK
No of words: 644.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58850931677 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0375743251 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10717156936 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495341614907 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1109.7 704.065955056 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.9361740699 60.3974514979 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.423076923 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370406552032 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101944068574 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596022994472 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211384577929 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354375189821 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 190.0 100.480337079 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.