The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Modern democratic society is sustained with the notion that the people of a society are the main source of power. All the decisions made for a society has to be directly or indirectly made by the majority of its people. So, questioning the authority is on of the most important characteristics required for well-being of a society.
People most care about themselves and their close ones. Authority's main job is to ensure well-being of that society. So when they take a decision, they might think about their own prosper, which, not necessarily would be the prospect of the society. People are the majority of the society. When they are concerned about their well-being and raise their voices, they would enhance their well-being.
Authority has power, so they have the chance to do things that are beneficial for themselves only. When they use their power with their will, they can harm the society. If there is a situation where the authority have to answer to the people of the society, it might help to ensure reserving peoples' right. Whenever the rights are violated, people would question and make the authority to change their decision.
If there is a situation where the authority has no one to answer, a good authority can get corrupted. At a point, members of the authority would not be able to recognize what is wrong and what is right. They have the power to do many things. They can make money, rig an election, and corrupt the judiciary, etc. If its people stops questioning the authority, they may get fooled by the power and start making wrong decisions.
There are some situation, where, if most of the people are questioning the authority, might not necessarily be the situation that the authority is wrong. People of the society of a particular region may be politically involved with an opposition party. So they may oppose everything of an authority. And a decision may not be beneficial to all the people of the country, but may be beneficial to some people and that is the right decision in question of human rights. In that case, questioning the authority could violate human rights.
So it is necessary to exist a situation where people question the authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 66
- Altruism is 80
- Manager s memorundum 55
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- It is more important to keep your old friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ON_OF_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one'?
Suggestion: one
...eople. So, questioning the authority is on of the most important characteristics r...
^^
Line 6, column 16, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'situations'?
Suggestion: situations
...making wrong decisions. There are some situation, where, if most of the people are quest...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85333333333 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70717762008 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3038243196 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.1304347826 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3043478261 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.26086956522 5.21951772744 24% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200361568528 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687317312012 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345843560353 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116430194642 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041655394374 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.