Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay: an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun?
When it comes to finding a job with same payment, is an interesting and challenging job with less break better or a job with more vacation but less fun have more advantages? Although some believe the later stands as the priority choice, it is the former contributes greater benefits for people.
It is so argued that having more vacation may make workers happy even the job itself is boring. Because, nowadays, people are more and more focus on their social life, and this work allows having more time to play, make friends, or take rest. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, when people older certain age, the time they spend on social life become less. People are more likely to concentrate on accomplishment of their jobs. If the work is has less challenge, they may feel boring and unhappy. For example, world famous president such as Boris Johnson or Donald Trump have a great social life when they were young, however, when they grew up, they care more about their challenging job.
Another disadvantage of taking less fun job is that as time go by, people may feel tired about their work owing to lacking interest. Besides, people may probably do not want to learn more knowledge by virtue of lacking challenge. It may let workers do not want to stay in this company for long term and have less opportunity to get promoted. By comparison, while people are doing something they truly love, they may feel glad about it, and even if it takes lots of time, people will unaware about it. Moreover, people will want to learn more new information about their jobs and willing to stay longer. Thus, it is more likely to be promoted.
So beneficial is having a more interesting job with less vacation that it must be taken into more consideration than the other choice. It is this choice make people happy and want to learn more.
- Some companies provide important products or services but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment As a consequence some people claim government should resort to greater penalty tax and fine to contain the harm made by these con w 70
- Nowadays people spend more time in their work or study If the purpose is to learn something within a small amount of time which do you prefer l learn a sport that you have never learned before 2 learn how to cook 3 learn to make something by hand making c 70
- People can solve important problems in daily life on their own or with the help from families so the help from government is not necessary 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- When it comes to sending email or messages whether is it suitable to allow workers to talk about work through it Although some believe company should allow that it is prohibiting worker to discuss work during weekend will contribute more benefits to the c 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt such as Boris Johnson or Donald Trump have a great social life when they were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71865443425 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41405108508 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519877675841 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8426647544 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4375 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330942653909 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115893378928 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152501548526 0.0758088955206 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26600024038 0.150359130593 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152351276864 0.0667264976115 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.