Some companies provide important products or services, but these
products or services also lead to damage on the environment. As a
consequence, some people claim government should resort to greater
penalty, tax, and fine to contain the harm made by these con
while many others believe there are better solutions. Which do you
think is the better way?
When it comes to proving important but damaging environment, whether is it necessarily to fine this company? Although some believe it is a good policy, it is finding other solutions contribute the greatest benefits for a country.
It is so argued that resorting greater penalty for a company who damage the environment is reasonable, since this is the only way for company to reduce their damage to environment. The supporters of this argument must be reminded that because of proving important products, this company may create thousands of jobs for the country. If the government fine these companies, they may likely to move to other countries where the environmental regulation is not strict. For example, in 1990, when Taiwan enroll restrict environmental laws, lots of bosses decided to move their factories to China, and it caused thousands of people lost their jobs. By contrast, if government subsidize those companies to develop new technology to reduce the emission of carbon-dioxide, or chemical substitute, they may not need to close their factories, and many people can retain their jobs. Moreover, this new tech can be sold to other countries, and make profits for the government.
Supporters of resorting higher tax for companies producing products which lead to damage on the environment may still argue that anyone should pay the price if they break the law. The real picture of this statement, however, is that not only does the company have to endure penalty, but consumers also have to pay higher price to buy the same products. Thus, it will add up additional costs for consumers and reduce the competitiveness of local companies. Eventually, consumers may start to choose products imported from other nations, and local business may force to be closed.
Giving penalty is not necessarily a cog to make the machine of country run. There are still lots of way such as giving subsidy can solve the problem.
- People can solve important problems in daily life on their own or with the help from families so the help from government is not necessary 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 58
- People may become homesick when they stay in a new place after a while in your opinion what will be the best way to ease nostalgia for the newcomers 1 do or eat the things previously done or eaten at hometown 2 contact old friends at hometown 3 participat 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require all graduate students to take courses public speaking Give specific examples and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocal business may force to be closed. Giving penalty is not necessarily a cog ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11356466877 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82869098713 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1583421753 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.785714286 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182725939983 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598544556942 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564024877802 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967018508594 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452751608398 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.