Women, due to their inherent physical differences, are not suited for some tasks.
The issue posed by the speaker that whether men and women, because of their inherent physical characteristics, are not equally suited for many tasks is a contentious one. Despite, the issue being a debatable one, I am at variation with the speaker that there is a set of tasks and women are not suited for due to their physical abilities. I believe that there are always going to be hurdles for both men and women to accomplish certain physical tasks. But that in no way should stop women from being able to prove themselves in those physically demanding tasks.
First, the avaition industry on its advent was highly biased towards men. On a contrary, today we see women also being an active part of the industry. Thus, it is only when women are given opportunuties to prove themselves, that they can push themeselves to acheive task that once seemed impossible. This example can be further developed by quoting Amelia Farhart, the first female aviator to fly solo across the Atlantic. She said that "Women, like men should try to do the impossible. And when the fail, their failure should be a challenge for others".
Furthermore, the fact is that to push your physical boundaries you need to be provided with the opportunity and guidance to acheive the same. Thus, for women to represent themselves in physically demanding tasks, it is very important that they are provided with the right kind of training. The training process required for women may differ from men in some aspects. But investing resources to develop a system that keeps in mind both men and women will definitely prove advantageous in the long run.
Critics to this view point argue that a few feilds, like certain positions in the military are not suited for women. This view point fails to undermine the discussion that women should be given equal opportunies as women have proven themselves in the past in all fields which were not considered approriate for them back then. This discussion is being taken seriously and women are being trained to take up positions like safeguarding the national boundary.
In the final analysis, for women to actively be a part of physically demanding feilds, it is crutial that they are provided equal opportunities and resources to do the same. Thus, it can be assured that physical differences between men and women is not a impediment to their representation in certain feilds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | sumitb123 | 50 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | akshitha shetty | 58 | view |
- The first step for self-knowledge is the rejection of the familiar. 50
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- Women, due to their inherent physical differences, are not suited for some tasks. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in those physically demanding tasks. First, the avaition industry on its adve...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould be a challenge for others'. Furthermore, the fact is that to push yo...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly prove advantageous in the long run. Critics to this view point argue that a ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ke safeguarding the national boundary. In the final analysis, for women to acti...
^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ifferences between men and women is not a impediment to their representation in c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9236453202 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75111245117 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504926108374 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8431036814 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.210526316 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31578947368 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352220581763 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116144130524 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857733022105 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205534910165 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112278517751 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.