The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Given are the charts providing statistical information about the proportion of main fuel sources in production process of electricity, namely; coal, oil, natural gas, hydro power and nuclear power across the two decades in various countries. Overall, the total production of electricity almost doubled in both indicated countries and Australia preferred using coal as the major source whereas France utilized quite various sources in 1980 and preferred nuclear power in 2000.
It is apparent that, in Australia half of total production belonged to coal which experienced a threefold increase during 20 years. Furthermore, the usage of hydro power soared by 16 units while figures for natural gas and oil fell dramatically, to be more precise, from 20 to 2 units and from 10 to 2 units respectively.
In comparison with Australia, France used nuclear power as an additional source and the main share belonged to coal and natural gas which were identical (25 %) and closely followed by oil, nuclear power and hydro power accordingly. Between 1980 and 2000 there were a staggering alteration in distribution of fuel sources, to be more specific, the share of nuclear power was approximately three fourth of total production while figures for oil and coal, and hydro power and natural gas showed the similar indicators.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 90
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 68
- The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time. 88
- the chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 90
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. 75
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Some sentences are too long and are not clear to readers.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 210 200
No. of Characters: 1079 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.138 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.326 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.546 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.769 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.169 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4