The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph shows the daily needs between fish and the diversity of meat; chicken, beef and lamp in a European country for a five-year period from 1979 to 2004.
In 1979, the personal consumption of beef was the highest request which is shown more than 200 grams in a week. Even though the request of beef got its top at the first period, but it fell gradually year-by-year to nearly 100 grams in the end of period.
On the other hand, fish, the lowest used of European performed normally form beginning to the end period, it is shown by it’s perform from approximately 60 grams in 1970 to about 50 grams in 2004.
Actually, the chicken and lamp request were quite much in 1979 which was about 150 grams. However, in 2004, chicken lead all of the consumption to 250 grams, but lamp fell to approximately 60 grams on the same occasion.
Generally, the US needs of meat and fish were not predictable. It might be because the variety needs of protein on human body.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-22 | Irene Ridson | 70 | view |
2013-11-22 | Nur Shabrina | 65 | view |
2013-11-22 | nikilos | 70 | view |
2013-11-12 | indah_hai | 70 | view |
2013-11-12 | Yora | 48 | view |
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 87
- Explain about your English teacher. What do you think? 87
- Complete the gaps in the summary below of this graph using a comparative or superlative form of the words in brackets. 60
- Do you agree that money is the only motivation at work why people prefer work in same company for many years 73
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below. 63
chicken lead all of the consumption
chickens lead all of the consumption
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 175 200
No. of Characters: 762 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.637 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.354 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.374 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 39 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 18 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.131 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.443 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.814 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.145 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4