Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may have a negative impact on others.
To what extent is this style of management effective?
Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard?
In companies it is one of the most important tasks of employers to motivate their workers in order to increase the effectiveness of them and the overall benefit of the company. For centuries many economist have attempted hard to find most influential method of motivating and paying extra money for distinctive contributions has usually been on the top list of such methods. But many people claim that, this motivating style is not perfect, because although it is stimuli for workers getting prize, it usually affects the others’ working desire negatively. I don’t completely agree with this opi...
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extend do you agree or disagree 82
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990. 75
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 82
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 85
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Sentence: As we all know, competition usually trigger improvement and as a result of this fact, it can be said that money awards usually cause total rise in the general success rate of company.
Description: The fragment competition usually trigger is rare
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1495 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.792 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.592 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.623 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.671 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5