Writing Task 1 (at least 150 words)The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.images:

Essay topics:

Writing Task 1 (at least 150 words)

The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.

summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

images:

The pie charts show how dangerous waste products are dealt in Republic of Korea, Sweden and United Kingdom.

From the first pie chart, representing information of Republic of Korea, we can see that recycling is used the most when dealing with dangerous waste products. It has a percentage of 69%. Underground is the second opinion with a percentage of 22%, and lastly incineration is used the least, with a percentage of 9%.

From the second pie chart, we can see that in Sweden, underground is used the most with a percentage of 55% when dealing with dangerous waste products. Follow by recycling of 25% and incineration of 20%.

From the third pie chart, we can see that in United Kingdom, underground is used the most when dealing with dangerous waste products. It has a percentage of 82%. Dumping at sea and chemical treatment have the same percentage of 8%, and incineration is used the least , with a percentage of only 2%.

In conclusion, from the pie charts, United Kingdom is the only country that does not use recycling. At the same time, it is also the only country that uses dumping at sea and chemical treatment, and this may result in having pollution in the sea.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-02-11 Emmanuel Alvarez 61 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user amelia :

Comments

Sorry to mark this essay late. For some reasons, the essay didn't go to our mail list on time.
Remind us by Contact us or simply comment your own essays next time if the essay is not evaluated in 24 hours.

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 206 200
No. of Characters: 932 1000
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.788 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.524 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.716 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.727 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.898 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.545 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.467 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.695 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.213 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4