The pie chart shows how dangerous waste products are managed in the Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom. It compares five different methods overall and the figures are represented in percentage points.
Recycling is the most popular method to deal with hazardous waste in the Republic of Korea with 69%, while in Sweden only 25% of waste are processed in the same way. In the United Kingdom, on the other hand, waste products are not recycled.
Underground disposal is employed with the 82% of the waste in the United Kingdom, followed by Sweden with 55% and the Republic of Korea with 22%.
Incineration is the third most common method to process dangerous waste in Sweden and the Republic of Korea with 20% and 9% respectively. However, in the United Kingdom only 2% of waste products are incinerated, which makes it one the last popular ways to manage waste in this country.
The United Kingdom uses chemical treatments and dumps the waste at the sea an 8%. In contrast, the Republic of Korea and Sweden do not use those methods to deal with hazardous waste products.
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of wild birds in the United Kingdom between 1970 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not. 56
- Writing Task 1 (at least 150 words)The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.images: 61
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orea and Sweden do not use those methods to deal with hazardous waste products. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while, in contrast, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86096256684 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50407885966 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486631016043 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7823379593 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165178147926 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866870427734 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567070902843 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113569112054 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290321531373 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.