The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980 and 2000, and the world's top ten exporters of fish in 2000.
The bar chart and table illustrate statistics about fishing in millions in different regions from 1970 to 2000.
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official if compared with all regions in 1970, 1980 and 2000 at 9-13-24 million. Coming second in 1970 with 1.3 million, Africa rose to 2 million in 1980 and 2000. Breathtakingly, South America had steady number of fishers in 1.2 million during the period. While the fluctuation occurred in Europe with 0,6 million in 1970, this region contracted to 0,3 million in 1980 and returned to 0,6 million ...
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxin 80
- The Graph show the proportion of the population 65 aged and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.-Syerapke- (rewrite) 60
- You have a friend who is about to enter university, and he wants you to advise him on which subject to specialize in – history, in which he is very interested, or computer science, which offers better job prospects.You should write at least 150 words.You 90
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 80
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think are consumers influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 80
Comments
Thanks Mr. testbig :)
Thanks Mr. testbig :)
Good Morning from Indonesia,
Good Morning from Indonesia, Mr. testbig. After I re-read the last report writing I composed above, then I realize that there raised some issues with coherence and cohesion. Next, compared with the grammatical mechanics you've shown, I know that is silly mistake I've ever done. As all the reasons I have explained, I go editing my page above. I do hope I could know what the next result you'll give it to me. Please kindly re-mark my last report writing. I look forward to hearing from you, sir.
Thanks in advance.
- eddy
Attribute Value
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 219 200
No. of Characters: 1070 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.847 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.527 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.209 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.718 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.625 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Many thanks, Mr.testbig :)
Many thanks, Mr.testbig :)
Sir, I have a question: "Is
Sir, I have a question: "Is there any significant difference between composition which has got marked 7.5 labelled STICKY and 7.5 with no label?" If any, could you please tell me? By comparison with other writings, this issue has been raised.
I look forward to hearing from the answer. Thanks.
- eddy
No difference. The issue is
No difference. The issue is fixed for this essay.
It is glad news for me, many
It is glad news for me, many thanks, sir.
You are welcome, Eddy!
You are welcome, Eddy!
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, where was the high-ranking officials
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official
1,2 million
1.2 million
flaws:
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 216 200
No. of Characters: 1068 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.944 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.589 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.526 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.412 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.721 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4