The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980 and 2000, and the world's top ten exporters of fish in 2000.

Essay topics:

The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980 and 2000, and the world's top ten exporters of fish in 2000.

Submitted by eddysuaib on Fri, 01/10/2014 - 02:26

The bar chart and table illustrate statistics about fishing in millions in different regions from 1970 to 2000.

The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official if compared with all regions in 1970, 1980 and 2000 at 9-13-24 million. Coming second in 1970 with 1.3 million, Africa rose to 2 million in 1980 and 2000. Breathtakingly, South America had steady number of fishers in 1.2 million during the period. While the fluctuation occurred in Europe with 0,6 million in 1970, this region contracted to 0,3 million in 1980 and returned to 0,6 million ...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 9.2 (10 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2014-06-30 lambda 90 view
2014-01-10 eddysuaib 92 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user eddysuaib :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, where was the high-ranking officials
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official

1,2 million
1.2 million

flaws:
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 216 200
No. of Characters: 1068 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.944 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.589 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.526 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.412 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.721 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4

Good Morning from Indonesia, Mr. testbig. After I re-read the last report writing I composed above, then I realize that there raised some issues with coherence and cohesion. Next, compared with the grammatical mechanics you've shown, I know that is silly mistake I've ever done. As all the reasons I have explained, I go editing my page above. I do hope I could know what the next result you'll give it to me. Please kindly re-mark my last report writing. I look forward to hearing from you, sir.

Thanks in advance.

- eddy

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 219 200
No. of Characters: 1070 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.847 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.527 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.209 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.718 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.625 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4

Sir, I have a question: "Is there any significant difference between composition which has got marked 7.5 labelled STICKY and 7.5 with no label?" If any, could you please tell me? By comparison with other writings, this issue has been raised.

I look forward to hearing from the answer. Thanks.

- eddy