The graph gives information about international tourist arrivals in the period of time 1990-2005 for different parts of the world: specifically are analyzed data about South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, South- East Asia, Central and Eastern Europe and North America.
Foe what concerns the first two continents, it is possible to notice that they had a similar positive trend to rise all over the years: in fact, in 1990 the amount of arrivals was approximately of 10 million for both of them, while in 2005 Sub-Saharan Africa reached a pick of almost 20.
Another comparison can be made between South-East Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: they both registered an upward tendency and although during the years arrivals for Europe fluctuated more, in 2005 the total reached was superior to Asia, nearly 80 million.
At the end, it can be considered by itself North America that after a first period of constant growth, remained stable from 2000 to 2005 with a number of arrivals in the range between 80 and 90 million.
- The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 93
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 75
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrolSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 65
- In some countries young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies What do you think are the cause of this What solutions can you suggest 47
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature. and make comparison where relevant. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 830 1000
No. of Different Words: 105 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.854 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.595 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.588 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.174 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4