The graph gives information about international tourist arrivals in the period of time 1990-2005 for different parts of the world: specifically are analyzed data about South America, Sub-Saharan Africa, South- East Asia, Central and Eastern Europe and North America.
Foe what concerns the first two continents, it is possible to notice that they had a similar positive trend to rise all over the years: in fact, in 1990 the amount of arrivals was approximately of 10 million for both of them, while in 2005 Sub-Saharan Africa reached a pick of almost 20.
Another comparison can be made between South-East Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: they both registered an upward tendency and although during the years arrivals for Europe fluctuated more, in 2005 the total reached was superior to Asia, nearly 80 million.
At the end, it can be considered by itself North America that after a first period of constant growth, remained stable from 2000 to 2005 with a number of arrivals in the range between 80 and 90 million.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Students should pay the full cost of university studies,rather than have free higher education provided by the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 43
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- Recent figures show an increase in violent crime among youngsters under the age of 18 Some psychologists claim that the basic reason for this is that children these days are not getting the social and emotional learning they need from parents and teacher 84
- It is generally believed that the internet is an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not be the best place to find information. 70
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 171 200
No. of Characters: 830 1000
No. of Different Words: 105 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.616 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.854 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.595 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 44 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 42.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.016 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.588 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.174 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4