The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates the factors underlying the decrease of agricultural area in the world and the table compares the picture of those factors in North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s.
Overall, the most common causes of land degradation was over-grazing, while the least prevalent was over-cultivation. Europe had the biggest agricultural area degradation compared to Oceania and North America.
To Begin with, over-grazing dominated the factor behind of agricultural area at 35%, followed by the number of deforestation which hot almost one-third of all causes.
Moreover, in terms of deforestation, Europe had almost tenfold percentage than North America. This figure was similar with regard to the over-grazing where Oceania was ten times higher than Nort America, making North America has a small number of total land degraded which was only one-twentieth.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your won opinion. 70
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 70
- Increasing the price of petrol is best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 70
- The graphs below show the type of music CDs purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...s in North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s. Overall, the most common causes of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... Nort America, making North America has a small number of total land degraded which was only one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['moreover', 'third', 'while', 'to begin with', 'with regard to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.322580645161 0.268076937826 120% => OK
Verbs: 0.122580645161 0.116061578633 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0774193548387 0.0759168565197 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0387096774194 0.0366838410393 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.148387096774 0.155750635184 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0387096774194 0.0379272487307 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71485284341 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0193548387097 0.0210936926555 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00645161290323 0.00175180941692 368% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.103225806452 0.0948980150116 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0193548387097 0.00967000014798 200% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 882.0 1161.00487805 76% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.9 71% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.34532374101 5.90752243213 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73763899035 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402877697842 0.337110787985 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.287769784173 0.247514529752 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.187050359712 0.171178102325 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107913669065 0.112407865282 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71485284341 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618705035971 0.546246751206 113% => OK
Word variations: 53.1428331302 49.3433353143 108% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1666666667 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9787185862 42.9750493124 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 135.714022679 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.689975730869 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 51.9436450839 47.7609492067 109% => OK
Elegance: 3.16 2.94281807926 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346772057251 0.418131533498 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14082922026 0.181151798455 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0196921611021 0.0850326197045 23% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.777222403196 0.706616315825 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.19374231976 0.157042692854 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184418828271 0.228904883108 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135226384495 0.108899403657 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284649182141 0.367819155151 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0550722125614 0.0812612215331 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243684074713 0.316326947829 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131030060746 0.0921553760075 142% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.14146341463 263% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 0.956097560976 314% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
--------------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.0 Out of 9