The pie chart depicts the factors responsible for land degradation worldwide. The table, on the other hand, gives a regional breakdown of this degradation during the 1990s.
Referring to pie chart, the principle factor responsible for unproductive land is over-grazing, which contributed almost 35% to land degradation. In addition, deforestation and over-cultivation accounted for 30% and 28% respectively. Other reasons are considerably lower at 7%.
It is quite illusive from the table that Europe had the highest deforestation rate of 9.8% followed by Oceania and North America with 1.7% and ...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: rivaiw
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Even though globalization effect the world’s economies in very positive way, its negative side shouldn’t be forgotten. Discuss. 78
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive and the table shows these affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 93
- School concentrated far too much on traditional subjects which do noy adequate prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern worldDo you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 87
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 83
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 186 200
No. of Characters: 993 1000
No. of Different Words: 106 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.693 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.339 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.365 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 67 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 55 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.302 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.455 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.406 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.638 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.105 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4