-
The bar graphs illustrate the share of households in owned and rented in two different countries (England and Wales) in 1918 and 2011.
Overall, it is readily apparent that the proportion of household in rented accommodation was greater than the household in owned accommodation during that time, whereas the maximum percentage of household in owned accommodation was in 2001, and the percentage of household in rented accommodation remained the lowest. However, the largest percentage of household in rented accommodation was in 1918 while the percentage of household in owned accommodation remained minimum. Additionally, both owned and rented household in accommodation was in the same proportion in 1971.
In 1981, the household in owned accommodation was approximately 23%. It developed to almost 32% in 1939 and remained constant in 1953. Then, it improved significantly from about 23% to around 69% in 2011. However, it slightly decreased at 64% in 2011.
As far as household in rented accommodation concerned, 1918 was the bomb year with nearly 78% which started to drop afterward. Thought it remained constant at roughly 69% in 1939 and 1953, it continued to go down until it reached 31% in 2011. In the year 2011, it slightly increased to 37%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | rchauhan.micro | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Gunjan Pratap | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | sanjay marwaha | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | angellica | 84 | view |
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- The plan below shows the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some say you should always marry for love; others say that in an uncertain world it is wiser to marry for money. Discuss both points of view and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge a 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25373134328 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18094528569 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457711442786 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 73.3898229709 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.