the two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the difference of roadway entrance to city medical center over a three-year period between 2007 and 2010.
It can be clearly seen that the principal change to the city hospital’s surrounding were infrastructures such as newly roundabout, vehicle car park’s position, and the bus stop that improved into the bus station. However, there was no change on the ring road around the city hospital.
Prior in 2010, exactly three years ago, there were no roundabouts built near the city health center. Later, two roundabouts were constructed on both ends of the hospital road in the south of the hospital. Newly bus station was established to replace the bus stop on the left-side of hospital road and connected to both roundabouts.
Automobile park for staff and the public was divided into two separate places. The staff car park stayed at the current position on the northern right-hand side city road, while public car park moved to the eastern of the city hospital, adjacent to ring road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-19 | radiatesun | 78 | view |
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? 61
- Shopping is now one of the most popular forms of leisure activity in many countries for young adults.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? 84
- - 11
- The plan below shows the layout of a university's sports center now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77227617907 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3346084602 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163960193913 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765426101458 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305644760293 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102989000376 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231153512303 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.