1. The amount of money spent on books.
The chart illustrates the expenditure on books in four different nations over the course of 10 years, starting from 1995. Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of money spent on books in all 4 countries. Additionally, Germany registered the highest figures throughout the given period, which peaked in 2005. Austria displayed the greatest difference, remaining unchanged over 3 years.
In 1995, $80 million was spent on books in Germany. France and Italy consumed a similar expense of books, at $55 million and $50 million, respectively. In contrast, the spending on books in Austria witnessed far more lower, at $30 million.
The expenditure on books in Germany continued to be higher than other 3 nations throughout the rest of period, approximately $100 million in 2005. Meanwhile, there was a dramatic increase in the expenditure on books in France, roughly $75 million in 2005. Despite some minor fluctuations, the spending figures for Italy rose significantly by $32 million to reach $ 72 million in the final year. In Austria, spending on books exhibited a gradual ascent during 4 years, before a plateau at $40 million was seen in this data from 1999 to 2001. Finally, this figure reached a peak at $ 70 million in 2005.
- The charts compare the amount of electricity produced by all types of sources in New Zealand and Germany 67
- The table below shows expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 78
- 1.The amount of money spent on books. 78
- Writing task1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'lower' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: lower
...nding on books in Austria witnessed far more lower, at 0 million. The expenditure on boo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$72'.
Suggestion: $72
...ose significantly by 2 million to reach $ 72 million in the final year. In Austria, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$70'.
Suggestion: $70
... Finally, this figure reached a peak at $ 70 million in 2005.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99512195122 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92421807778 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570731707317 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.790472004 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0768595534533 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361963772431 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755061752564 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650536374621 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048455737494 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.