waste collection
The graph demonstrates how much waste was collected by a recycling center over the course of 5 years, starting from 2011. Overall, there was an upward trend in the collection of waste from gardens and three other materials. Additionally, garden waste collection registered the lowest figures throughout the whole period, bottoming in 2012.
In 2011, the amount of paper waste collected was highest, standing at 57 tons. This figure in turn witnessed a considerable descent to hit a trough of 40 tons two years later, before a sharp ascent to reach the highest value on record of 70 tons was seen in 2015. Meanwhile, a noticeable fluctuation from 48 tons in 2011 to top at 52 tons in 2015 was exhibited in glass waste collection.
35 tons of tins waste was collected in the first year of the period. This figure then decreased markedly to reach a record-low of 27 tons one year later, before climbing marginally to 39 tons in 2015. Similarly, a two-fold decline to 15 tons between 2011 and 2012 was seen in the garden trash collection, which rapidly ascended to 35 tons over the next 3 years.
- people communication 67
- The table gives information about consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 78
- Crime 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different nations in 2002. 84
- The charts compare the amount of electricity produced by all types of sources in New Zealand and Germany 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, similarly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73821989529 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70696324497 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596858638743 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4494620001 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296716937339 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18273300796 0.103423049105 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146171206903 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240565903914 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139389816535 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.