28.The table below gives information about transportation of five kinds of products imported from Hong Kong in 1999 and 2002.
The table compares the expenditure allocated on commodities of 5 different types of products imported from Hong Kong in 1999 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the total production in 1999 was far lower than that in 2002. Moreover, while the figures for foods and clothes experienced a decline during the 2 years, the opposite trend was witnessed in the 3 other types of items.
According to the table,starting from 31,9 dollars in 1999, the price for productions in UK was ended up with 38,28 dollars in 2002, with a rising rate of 20%.
In 1999, foods dominated the first place in 1999 with 50 dollars before witnessing a 20% drop to only 4 dollars in 2002. The clothes items, which experienced an identical trend, slightly decreased from 6,5 dollars to 6,37 dollars in the last year. In contrast, starting with the lowest figure in 1999, metals’ price then increased significantly by a rate of 110% , accounting for 4,83 dollars in 2002. Like wise, while the manufactured products increased their budget from 10,2 dollars to 11,6 dollars, machinery area also saw a remarkable growth with a rate of 48,1%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , starting
... types of items. According to the table,starting from 31,9 dollars in 1999, the price fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the lowest figure in 1999, metals’ price then increased significantly by a rate o...
^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ncreased significantly by a rate of 110% , accounting for 4,83 dollars in 2002. Li...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87894736842 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72321779039 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5608300959 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.875 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205776937557 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103656777305 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894234936535 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156296734302 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904740309359 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.