Academic staff percentages in faculties by gender 2012

Essay topics:

Academic staff percentages in faculties, by gender, 2012.

The figure illustrates the percentages of academic staff in faculties by gender in 2012. At first glance, it is evident that the male staffs are higher than female workers in four different sectors.

To begin with, Male staffs are dramatically higher than women workers in Engineering, which constituted 3 times higher than the total number of women staffs. Law, Science and Business additionally have the same pattern, in which male staffs, which was approximately at 60%, just above 60%, and just over six in ten respectively, are higher than females, which made up at four in ten in Law, just below four in ten in Science and Business.

In contrast, Females have an enormous number in Arts, Education and Medicine instead of males. the number of females worker is three times higher than men staffs in Education. It is also be the case for arts, in which females are higher roughly around 15% higher than men. Nevertheless, there was a little difference in the number of worker in medicine in between men and women.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (9 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-11 Desi Sari Ayuni 67 view
2022-11-10 Angina 67 view
2022-10-13 Angina 56 view
2022-04-06 samandarkumar 73 view
2022-02-18 deepak krishnamurthy 61 view
Essays by user alifdores :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ducation and Medicine instead of males. the number of females worker is three times...
^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...han men staffs in Education. It is also be the case for arts, in which females are...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, so, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8908045977 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63357013139 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1398372624 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121215493345 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934122519277 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18328280009 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138540846685 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163915794293 0.0819641961636 200% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.