The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012

Essay topics:

The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012.

The graph illustrates the percentage of men and women academic staff members across the faculties of a main university in 2012. Overall, it is noticeable that the highest percentage was 80% that was of female from engineering faculty whereas the same faculty had the leaat percentage of male which was only 15%. In the year 2012, it can be seen that the academic male staff percentage in faculty arts was 45% which lagged by 5% form female of same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but only 25% were male. In case of business faculty, men were found to be more by 30% in comparison to women that is 35%. The academic staff percentage of male and female in medicine faculty was seemed to be quite similar; female percentage led by nearly 2% only where male percentage was 50. Furthermore, in the faculty of science, there was a difference of 30% between male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law faculty, it was observed that male staff was 60% and female was 40%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-10 Angina 67 view
2022-10-13 Angina 56 view
2021-05-05 shaimaa elyamny 78 view
2020-12-23 sonia 7022 84 view
2020-10-28 thatfrostbyte 73 view
Essays by user Angina :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but onl...
^^
Line 1, column 926, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...een male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law facult...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6174863388 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50379389037 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5036114104 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426966157651 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239608739958 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153700768837 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426966157651 0.15604864568 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... same faculty. Similarly, 70% of members were female in education faculty but onl...
^^
Line 1, column 926, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...een male and female staff; male was 65%.At last, looking at the data of law facult...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6174863388 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50379389037 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5036114104 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426966157651 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239608739958 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153700768837 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.426966157651 0.15604864568 274% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.