Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In order to decrease the total of the unemployment in the world, females are supposed to stop for working and go back to their conventional roles. In accordance with this argument, this essay will explain the point of view of this issue and also put forward my perspective in the following paragraphs.
In regard to the statement above, I do appreciate to the assumption that realizing the existence of females for working worsens the amount of the male’s unemployment. Nevertheless, I tend to oppose this thought and consider that this attempt is going to produce unwanted impacts for numerous females across the globe.
According to my perspective, as a value of equality has been spread out, we, as a male, are unable to think something which is going to render a profit merely for males, therefore, we have to consider everything from different sides and the impact of it. Regarding to this influence, there are several consequences which related to the statement above. It, first and foremost, is going to worsen the number of female’s unemployment around the earth in which it will create other negative impacts for individuals' life. Second but not less crucial, it is apparent that this effort, additionally, is solely going to render a benefit for males, by this thought, it will make females feeling unappreciated by males and making the relations between these two genders getting worst.
By way of conclusion, it seems to me that in order to create an equal positive influence for all persons, the endeavours of stopping females from their vocation is not necessary to be done. Thus, the authority of every nation has to produce a strict law which related to this issue in order to create a better outcome for both genders.
- Process the lifecycle of a butterfly 64
- Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorernations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility forhelping the poorer nations in such areas.To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich do you agree or disagree 32
- Some people believe that computers are more a hindrance than a help in today's world. Others feel that they are such indispensable tools that they would not be able to live or work without them.In what ways are computers a hindrance?What is your opin 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pective in the following paragraphs. In regard to the statement above, I do app...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98634812287 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83513203421 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.980421454 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.1 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0955381708898 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460652499545 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521681786752 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681680599048 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248203972319 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.