the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012,2014 and 2016.
The table illustrates the quantities of beef that was exported in 5 countries in the years 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Overall, the beef exported rate in Brazil was much more higher than that in 4 countries combined. Also, Japan had the highest growth rate in exported beef industry among 5 countries.
Looking at the table more closely, one can see that there was an upward pattern in the amount of beef exported by Brazil over the 5-years period, from 125.465 tons in 2012 to 137,650 tons in 2016. Furthermore, there was an apparent speeding up in the rate of exported beef in Japan, increased by almost five times what they were in 2012. The second-largest beef exporter was Uruguay, which consistently exported around 40,000 tons per year. In contrast, Switzerland and Norway were the smallest exported rate in the beef production during the same period, with both nations shipping under 100 tons in all three years. Interestingly, Norway’s beef exported value steeply surge almost double above its in 2012 figured, before notably plunged to 17 by the year 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | phạm khánh linh | 60 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-17 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the employment rate of each gender in four different countries in 2002 4 73
- The difference in the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 67
- The number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The amount spent by those visitors in that period 67
- changes in student enrollment by degree at a university in Canada in 1980 and 2000
- the proportion of workers in three different sectors in South Korea between 1981 and 2011 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e beef exported rate in Brazil was much more higher than that in 4 countries combined. Also...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tons in all three years. Interestingly, Norway’s beef exported value steeply sur...
^^
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...notably plunged to 17 by the year 2016.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96089385475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57844076776 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4524698785 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397142340937 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187926939198 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101106944895 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305639200452 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102260015112 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.