The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
The table gives information about the rate of waste things ( millions of tonnes) in six particular nations from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the rate of waste production in US was highest among six areas but Ireland is lowest and higher more than in last year. However, we can see clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the table chart in 1980, the amount of waste production in Ireland was lowest among six areas about 0,6 millions tonnes but in 1990 they are not any information. Meanwhile, in Japan and US were highest and they are still higher than in next year about 28 and 131 millions tones. In Poland and Portugal, the rate of waste production is higher than Ireland but the rare is not still higher about 4 and 2 millions tonnes but Korea they didn’t had any information in this year. However, all amount of waste in six nations change too much in. 1990. First, Ireland didn’t give about the rate in this year but Japan and Korea have significantly increased from 28 to 32 and not information to 31 millions tonnes. In US they are still highest ( 151 millons tonnes). Others, Poland and Poruland increased to 5 and 3 millions tonnes.
Look at the table chart in 2000, it can be seen that US was still highest about 192 millions tonnes. Highest second affter US was Japan and increased from 32 to 53 million tonnes. However, in Korea and Poland is stable about 19 and 6,6 millions tonnes. Finally, Portugal and Ireland about 5 and 5 millions tonnes. So, from that table chart in six areas, people can see how much waste production over the world and people in US should protect environment because they are alwasy have a higher rate in 20 period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-22 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thuphuong2302 | 78 | view |
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree Write at least 250 words 78
- The chart below show the average maximum and minimum temperatures between Brisbane and Canberra and the average number of days with rainfall in these two countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- The map below show the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 87
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation about the rate of waste things millions of tonnes in six particular nat...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '6 million'
Suggestion: 6 million
...land was lowest among six areas about 0,6 millions tonnes but in 1990 they are not any inf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '131 million'
Suggestion: 131 million
...l higher than in next year about 28 and 131 millions tones. In Poland and Portugal, the rate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '2 million'
Suggestion: 2 million
...he rare is not still higher about 4 and 2 millions tonnes but Korea they didn’t had any in...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'didn't' requires base form of this verb: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...2 millions tonnes but Korea they didn’t had any information in this year. However, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '31 million'
Suggestion: 31 million
...ed from 28 to 32 and not information to 31 millions tonnes. In US they are still highest 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons tonnes. In US they are still highest 151 millons tonnes. Others, Poland and P...
^^
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '3 million'
Suggestion: 3 million
... Poland and Poruland increased to 5 and 3 millions tonnes. Look at the table chart in 20...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '192 million'
Suggestion: 192 million
...be seen that US was still highest about 192 millions tonnes. Highest second affter US was Ja...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '6 million'
Suggestion: 6 million
...rea and Poland is stable about 19 and 6,6 millions tonnes. Finally, Portugal and Ireland a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '5 million'
Suggestion: 5 million
...nally, Portugal and Ireland about 5 and 5 millions tonnes. So, from that table chart in si...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 6.8 309% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 300.0 196.424390244 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3286118898 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 401.4 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4849022991 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249543930973 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974922801166 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717471394551 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17230598257 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436887475516 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.63 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.