The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016

Essay topics:

The amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year,2016.

The charts illustrates that the amount of money that a charity who is helping children in the USA got received and spent it in one year period at the start of 2016 and by the end of the timeframe

Overall, the two charts similar in the significant proportion of the money that spent or received, and the most Income resource that charity got is from Donated food and for expenditures they put program services as their first priority.

regarding the chart, around fourth fifth of charity donation got it from donated foods that, the figure for community contribution accounted for 10.4% just approximately tenth, the proportion of investment income in equal to the of government grand for 0,2 and it was the lowest resource of incoming donations, they got others incomes but it comprised 0.4%

ssecond, according to expenditures chart, most of the money spent it on program services with 95.4% or just over 95%, fundraising is similar relative to management and general in the amount of money spent accounted for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-12 tata 78 view
2024-10-12 tata 61 view
2024-10-12 tata view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view
2024-10-12 tata 73 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The charts illustrates that the amount of money that a charity...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 2016 and by the end of the timeframe Overall, the two charts similar in the s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gram services as their first priority. regarding the chart, around fourth fifth...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t others incomes but it comprised 0.4% ssecond, according to expenditures chart...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74229756197 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554285714286 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 87.0 22.4926829268 387% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.5 43.030603864 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 437.0 112.824112599 387% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 87.5 22.9334400587 382% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 18.5 5.23603664747 353% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272963902576 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248140333578 0.103423049105 240% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143330779823 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202386120667 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195252338598 0.0819641961636 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 45.8 13.2329268293 346% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -8.37 61.2550243902 -14% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 36.0 10.3012195122 349% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.47 8.06136585366 142% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 36.8 10.9970731707 335% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.