The amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year,2016.
The two bar charts compare the sources of money that a children’s charity gets, what are the organizations that donate, and the Expenditures or how the money is spent in the year 2016
Overall it seems that the money coming from donating organizations is more than the money spent on the children expenses because the total money coming from the revenue resources on the charity Surpassed the money spent on the children by around three hundred thousand dollars.
In regards to the revenue source donated food is the most donated by the organization with 86.8 % of the total income, and the second highest donation comes from community contributions at 10.4% after that the program revenue comes with 2.2% then the remaining 1% comes from the investment income, the government grants and other income.
The expenditures of the charity have a main general section of the expenses is the program service that it takes 95.8 % out of the total spent money otherwise the fundraising takes 2.6% and the least money is used for paying for the management and some other general expenses.
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 81
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 61
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...charts compare the sources of money that a children’s charity gets, what are the...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f money that a children’s charity gets, what are the organizations that donate, ...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow the money is spent in the year 2016 Overall it seems that the money coming f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...around three hundred thousand dollars. In regards to the revenue source donated...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...und three hundred thousand dollars. In regards to the revenue source donated food is the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: THREE_NN[1]
Message: You used three nouns after one another, and this might decrease readability. You might consider rewording the sentence.
...y contributions at 10.4% after that the program revenue comes with 2.2% then the remaining 1% comes f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he government grants and other income. The expenditures of the charity have a m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01657458564 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6062423198 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 60.0 22.4926829268 267% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5495016882 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 302.666666667 112.824112599 268% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 60.3333333333 22.9334400587 263% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235679240013 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152673162132 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143889749669 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169142059579 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122209244915 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.4 13.2329268293 245% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 19.04 61.2550243902 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.5 10.3012195122 248% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.0 10.9970731707 236% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.