Average distance in miles traveled per person per year, by mode of transportation
The table represents the mobility of citizens using different types of transportation, and it is measured by distance in miles each person per year between 1985 and 2000.
Overall, the total miles traveled by commuters saw an upward trend, while 3 out of 8 modes showed the reverse. During the period given, private transportation was still the most favorable.
Initially, the average distance of car users was by far the highest over a 15-year period, increasing to 4806 miles in 2000. Although the total distance for those who used the local bus and other transportation showing almost similar proportion, the final measurement was far different as the former increased to 585 miles per person and the later halved to 274 miles per person at the end of the period.
Pedestrians and travelers who prefer train started with almost similar level, but train then showed the popularity in the following fifteen years causing the significant increase of traveling to 366 miles. While traveling used taxi and long distance bus doubled in terms of distance reached, the miles traveled by bicycle experienced a steady decrease by 10 miles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | Le Thi Anh Suong 95 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | Tri H. Ho | 71 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Indri Eka Putri | 95 | view |
| 2019-03-24 | Afiotria Intan Wulansari | 84 | view |
- Schools use various methods to try and increase grades. What are the different methods they use? Which one is the most effective? 84
- The chart below show the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 61
- The table below shows the results of a survey of the average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitoring program. Traffic calming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999. 78
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for the urban population in different world regions. 84
- The pie charts below show percentages for the number of languages spoken by students surveyed from 6 different countries in Europe 44
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11827956989 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75422084347 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618279569892 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0756615358 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44389104814 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172162101431 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848318363804 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235092255282 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801833858237 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.