The bar chart illustrates the mean cost which the European Union had to pay for importing cloth from six particular countries in the years 1993, and 2003, the price was estimated per kilometer.
Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that the Latin American countries took more money than the Asians. Although in the picture rise and fall of money was seen, in the case of Brazil, it remained the same.
Regarding South American countries, the European Union paid most to Argentina when they brought cloth from them in both 1993 and 2003 and the price was approximately 28 and 26 respectively. Though the cost was climbed down to the next decade, when it comes to Brazil it did not go up or down, it remained identical which was 23 pounds.
Turning to the Asians, except Japan, in 2003 the price of importing cloth was increased. The Union had to pay 1.5 times more than the previous amount to China in 2003, while they gave only 10 pounds in 1993. Though they had to give less money to Bangladesh rather than the other countries, in 2003 they paid more than 5 pounds, whereas they had to give approximately 3 pounds in 1993.
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below describes percentages of homeschooled students in Some Country in 1999 2004 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 84
- In some cultures the old age is highly valued while in some cultures youth is highly valued Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...as estimated per kilometer. Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that the L...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey brought cloth from them in both 1993 and 2003 and the price was approximately...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6157635468 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39055873075 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1134168157 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264847648051 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125068066594 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134145127337 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182589753353 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146754494704 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.