The graph below shows how prices of “high-tech gadgets” changed over time in Some countries.
Write a report for a university tutor describing the information shown.
The line graph demonstrates the swamping of prices of two particular types of gadgets from the year 2004 to 2006.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that for both devices the price climbed down than the initial price. In the case of smartphones, the price went down by around 300 dollars, while the price of the navigation system dropped by 1220 dollars.
To begin with the navigation system, in 2004, initially, the price was close to 4000, then until 2005, the cost was dropped down sharply to 3200 dollars. After January 2005, the worth began to decrease slowly up to July then it rose linearly to 3400 dollars. Over the period 2006, it rapidly dropped to below 3000 dollars.
Turning to the smartphones, at the beginning the price was just over 3000 dollars, after that, it gradually decreased to approximately 2800 dollars. In the next 6 months, the price grew slowly and at the end of 2005, the cost stood at 2900 dollars. After, rest of the period it tended to decrease and end at the same amount of navigation system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-05 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- Some people say that Ebooks and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspapers and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
- Some people think that students in single sex schools perform better academically Others however believe that mixed schools provide children with better social skills for adult life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74863387978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38643333259 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.708300832 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105547129142 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052229314251 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410978748465 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757403597523 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316335643966 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.