The bar chart and the pie chart compare pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries between 2009 and 2019 as well as a breakdown of each pineapple s consumer cost in 2019

The bar chart illustrates how many pinapples was exported by the top three pinapple-producing countries between 2009 and 2019. The pie chart depicts the cost of each pinapple to the consumer, which is divided into different small parts.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of pineapples exported by country A and C, but pineapple exports of B saw a decrease. The highest percentage of the pinapple cost was the distribution and retail while the lowest was for export costs.
The number of pinapples exported by country A started at about 1 metric tonne in 2009, after which it saw a dramatic rise to upward 10 metric tonnes in 2019. Opposite changes can be seen in the proportion of country B, which fell from over 4 metric tonnes to just under 2 metric tonnes during the period between 2009 and 2019. The figure for the country C was at downward of 1 metric tonne, followed by a sight growth.
The percentage of distribution and retail factor was the highest, which accounted for 35%. Meanwhile, producer and export costs factors was the lowest figure. The proportion of profit, taxes, international transport and import licences were 18%, 16%, 12% and 10% subsequently.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is divided into different small parts. Overall, there was an increase in the nu...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while the lowest was for export costs. The number of pinapples exported by coun...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ric tonne, followed by a sight growth. The percentage of distribution and retai...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90547263682 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80313713234 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577114427861 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0325679195 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290781620048 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112678127762 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106066091172 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172005359017 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107724175787 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.