In the intergrational era, a number of education process students do not receive salary while working for a company in a short time. From my perspective, such a phenomenon triggers more adversities than merits.
Working without being paid contains some benefits, one of which is training a group of laboratory within spending time but not money. In fact, this is usually called the training stage of working, and after having completed this, employees are allowed to work in the company receiving money. Beside that, both students and company get good opportunity to work together, with students having more experience and group saving an amount of money. When students graduated from their university, the company may invite them to work if they excel some needed part of the work or they may apply for a job in this group.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, this kind of working has more drawbacks. Firstly, working for no money may lead to the workers being lack of motivation and energy to boost their morale, thus causing the decrease in creativity and productivity. Secondly, the flow cash will go up if the company does not adjust and try other training methods which are more feasible and more suitable. Therefore, the co-operation between both employers and their inferiors plays a vital role, and paying is an ideal way somehow. A telling example is some companies aquiring their reputation for technology such as Google or Apple group, paying a large amount of money to the individuals being trained or worked for them.
In conclusion, I suppose that working for a company and being paid no money may have more disadvantages than positive impacts due to the reason given above, and companies should change their training method to get higher income and better image
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS 67
- the diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Influence of human beings on worlds ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity what are the primary causes of the loss of biodiversity what solutions can you suggest 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the intergrational era, a number of e...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...triggers more adversities than merits. Working without being paid contains some...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey may apply for a job in this group. Despite the advantages mentioned above, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als being trained or worked for them. In conclusion, I suppose that working fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03378378378 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63932445924 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5360642329 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333487639923 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125347200614 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759290064062 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211163152741 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421234297408 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.