the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world.

The supplied bar chart depicts changes in percentage of population in metropolitan areas in six continents in 1950, 2007 and prediction in 2050.

Overall, it is obviously seen from the given illustration that number of inhibitants increase and it is forecasted that this trend will remain in future.

Firstly, Africa and Asia represented almost same percentage of population in urban areas in 1950 ( 15 and 17 per cent) with as far as same raising trend to forecasted in 2050, 62 and 66 per cent respectively. Also Latin America and Caribbean population is predicted to doubled in hundred years period from 42 to 89 per cent.

North America and Oceania did not dramatically increased amount of population living in urban areas. In 1950 more than half of population lived in cities (64 and 62 per cent) as in 2007 (79 and 71 %), for 2050 is forecasted same steady increasing trend. North America and in Europe will follow this trend, when in 2050, 90 per cent of North Americans will be living in urban areas as well as Europeans (just below 90 per cent).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... forecasted that this trend will remain in future. Firstly, Africa and Asia represente...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of population in urban areas in 1950 15 and 17 per cent with as far as same r...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... 2050, 62 and 66 per cent respectively. Also Latin America and Caribbean population ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...n population is predicted to doubled in hundred years period from 42 to 89 per cent. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'did' requires base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...merica and Oceania did not dramatically increased amount of population living in urban ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lived in cities 64 and 62 per cent as in 2007 79 and 71 %, for 2050 is forecasted...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79120879121 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73058966525 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3539102769 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181690335857 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933649977603 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642923951258 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112983568925 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764221417542 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.