The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world.
The given chart depicts the alterations in the rate of inhabitants residing in urban settings in six distinct regions in three different timestamps: 1950, 2007, and 2050.
Overall, an upward trend was seen in all selected areas throughout the period. Furthermore, all but Oceania experienced major differences.
Initially, in the year 1950, the rate of African population in this matter placed last with only 15%, lower than that of Asia by a margin of just 2%. The four other areas’ percentages were substantially higher, reaching roughly one half of their population.
57 years later, in 2007, changes in the ordering among these regions occurred, as Latin America climbed up to the second highest rank, swapping its place with Oceania. Most noticeably, Africa and Asia experienced a growth of merely a double, followed by an approximately 30% increase in Latin America. In comparison, the remaining areas saw a growth of one-fifth and below.
In the year 2050, a merely same rate of difference was seen in all selected parts of the world, except for Europe and Latin America/Caribbean, whose figures soared by a much smaller margin than they did before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | bich | view | |
| 2022-08-26 | hungdung2507 | view | |
| 2022-08-25 | hungdung2507 | view | |
| 2022-08-25 | hungdung2507 | view | |
| 2022-05-24 | zulaykho | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 78
- The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, second, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19576719577 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91744131814 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6963379869 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.111111111 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137885002372 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501512519463 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423581362677 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679359892571 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278117655936 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.