The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the data about the proportion of the folks who living in city areas in the various parts of the world, in the period of 1950 and 2007 and predicted about 2050.
According to graph, the North America has the most population than other continents. While, less population seems in the Africa.
In terms of the urban areas of the North America which had 64% and 79% people in 1950 and 2007 respectively and assumed that the population will be 90% within 2050. However, the regions of Latin America were contained less population than the Europe which stand 42 and 51 percent respectively in the year of 1950. The Caribbean had 76% population at the age of 2007 where the Europe also were contained similar number of public which was 72%. Moreover, It was assumed that the gathering of people will be risen at 89% in the part of the Latin America and 84% at the Europe.
The Oceania had been gathered with 62% population at 1950 and 71% residents started living at 2007 also it would be increased at 76% in 2050. On the other hand, The Asia and the Africa both continents had been similar population which varied at 3% to 4%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-05 gurleen kaurr 73 view
2020-10-05 prabin99 view
2020-10-02 ismatjahan 67 view
2020-10-02 ismatjahan 67 view
2020-10-02 ismatjahan 56 view
Essays by user ismatjahan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55555555556 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38919049693 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1426468829 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125618103243 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581839098117 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054305549597 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926750510582 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663227005535 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.