The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people of USA, that how often, they went to the fast food restaurants in the period of 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the graph depicts that most of the USA citizens were eating fast food at restaurants in various time. However, eating in once a week was popular at 2006, where, after 7 years, people loved to went the fast food restaurants in once or twice a month.
Turning to the graph in more details, in 2013 around 33% people were eating at fast food restaurants once or twice a month, while similar number of citizens went restaurants once a week in 2006. Earlier, in 2003 people who ate fast food between once a week and once a or twice a month that varied at 1%. The proportion of people had become poor who went once a month and twice in 2006, which stands 25%, in contrast with, frequently of eating at fast food restaurants in once a week at 27% in 2013.
Furthermore, in terms of several time a week for eating fast food at shops were favourite (20%) in 2006 among other time periods and in case of, 2003 and 2013 the rate stands at around 17% and 16% respectively. On the other hand, folks of USA had eaten at 13% in a few times a year, after three years, the figure of this categories people were rising at 15% and it remain same till 2013. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foodies and never ate person were similar which 5% in the tgree mentioned years.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-15 Zahid6400 56 view
2024-02-19 MinyiChu 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 67 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
2023-12-29 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user ismatjahan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people of USA, that h...
^^
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he bar chart illustrates the percentage of people of USA, that how often, they w...
^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...06 and 2013. Overall, the graph depicts that most of the USA citizens were eati...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h depicts that most of the USA citizens were eating fast food at restaurants in ...
^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wever, eating in once a week was popular at 2006, where, after 7 years, people lo...
^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stands 25%, in contrast with, frequently of eating at fast food restaurants in on...
^^
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
... 27% in 2013. Furthermore, in terms of several time a week for eating fast food at shops we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2013. Furthermore, in terms of several time a week for eating fast food at shop...
^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...gories people were rising at 15% and it remain same till 2013. The percentage rate for...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ain same till 2013. The percentage rate for every day eating fast foodies and never ate perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34831460674 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29039002402 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5520831638 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346097042988 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182192884707 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105604160923 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2616087128 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111015838069 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.