The bar chart shows the changes in percentage of population in urban areas in different part of the world in 100 years of interval.
Overall, the bar chart show the lowest population living in urban area which is in Africa, and the highest percentage of people living in urban area in North America in among all different part of the world.
Firstly, the ratio of population in Africa and Asia is little similar in 1950 the population was 15%, and 17% respectively and in 2007 than the ratio was 37% and 41% respectively but in the in 2050 the percentage will be 62% and 66% the total 10% population difference between Africa and Asia while Europe had 51 % was in 1950 and 72% in 2007 and the prediction the population will be 84% in 2050 Europe shows the greatest population among than Africa and Asia.
Secondly, the Latin America, North America and Oceanic overall the highest percentage of population in North America which is 64% in 1950 and 79% in 2007 and 90% will be in 2050. However, Latin America and Oceania had 42%, 76% and 89 % population in 1950, 2007 and 2050 respectively additionally, 62%, 71% and 76% population will be in 1950, 2007 and 2050 respectively.
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units per 100 inhabitants 68
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 67
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world s oil in OPEC and non OPEC countries Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63775139585 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418269230769 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.565174902 43.030603864 271% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.2 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.6 22.9334400587 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295151921904 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232257558401 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202409110106 0.0843802449381 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280021000541 0.15604864568 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199622917709 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.81 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.