The given bar chart illustrates how many vehicles were owned by 1000 people in China, during the period between the year 1987 to 1999.
It shows a steep slow progression initially from 1987 to 1993 with less than 300 in 1987 to approximately 1000 vehicles for 1000 people in 1993, Interestingly, an abrupt rise in the number of vehicles is noticed starting from the year 1995 as it got doubled to reach 2000 vehicles per 1000 people, which as much as the overall rise on vehicles numbers through the preceding 6 years. After which the upstroke continues at a steady rate every two years, with about 3000 vehicles per 1000 people at the year of 1997 comprising 1000 vehicles rise in 2 years, then lastly, it reached it`s highest point with 4500 vehicles for 1000 people at the year 1999.
In conclusion, China car ownership nearly doubled 15 folds in 12 years timescale with a sharp upstroke starting by the year 1995.
- Space tourism: Will it bring positive or negative effects on the world's development? Give your own opinion. Use example based on your experience. 84
- The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. what problems does it cause? how can we save these problems ? 43
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 78
- Pollution and other environmental damage are inevitable results when a country is developing and growing its wealth To what extent you agree or disagree 38
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownerships in China. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'vehicle' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'vehicles'.
Suggestion: vehicles
...rom less than 300 to approximately 1000 vehicle for 1000 people, then, an abrupt rise i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...to reach 2000 vehicles per 1000 people. after which the upstroke continues at a stead...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oubled 15 folds in 12 years timescale.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
lastly, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 561.0 965.302439024 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 120.0 196.424390244 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.675 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30975091965 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46744075692 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608333333333 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 150.3 283.868780488 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4703402942 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152918472265 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100285884311 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544368438314 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119020341976 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521723461531 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.41 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.