the bar chart below show the sector contributions to India's gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000
The bar chart illustrates sector contributions to India’s gross domestic product during the period 1960 to 2000. The data were measured in percentages. Overall, it can be seen that the services sector was a dramatic increase while the proportion of agricultural decreased gradually over four decades.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, the rate of gross domestic for services and industry began at a similar pattern, representing around 18 % in 1960, yet after thirty years the levels of GDP services continued to grow approximately 45 % in years 1990. In the same period, the gross domestic product was contributed by Industry sector which was fluctuation. Subsequently, in the 2000s, the percentages of services were an extreme rise, accounted about 50 %. Following by Industry was stable the same in the last years.
Moreover, in the years 1960, the amount of agricultural GDP was higher than other sectors, although the data declined respectively. From 1970 to 1990, the per cent of the industry showed a significant fall roughly 20 %. In contrast, agricultural experienced the lowest level throughout sectors over 10 % to finish the period.
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the frog from the egg stage to an adult frog 78
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The graph below shows the daily consumption of three spreads per person from 1981 to 2007 in a country 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...tages. Overall, it can be seen that the services sector was a dramatic increase while th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39226519337 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03960826534 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640883977901 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0596040669 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299340909279 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114419804263 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183086548402 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200928127718 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114175705062 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.