The bar chart below show the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world.
The bar chart compares the main reasons of land damage in different nations in the world.
As regards deforestation, almost 400 million hectares of land is damaged in africa and it experienced a rise to approximately 500 million hectares in asia, whereas tree- cutting was the least damage in australia and europe which caused the least damage to , accounting for almost 100 million hectares.
In case of breeding, the maximum land damaged in Africawhich comprised of 500 million hectares, which was almost 100 million hectares in europe.The land damage accounted for 400 million hectares in asia, which experienced a twofold decline of 200 million hectares in australia.
Due to farming, the land damage ewwas 300, 400, 50 and 100million hectares in africa, asia, australia and europe, respectively.
Overall, tree cutting, breeding and farming caused maximum damage in africa, while australia and europe experienced a relative less land damage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mage in different nations in the world. As regards deforestation, almost 400 mil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... europe which caused the least damage to , accounting for almost 100 million hecta...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s almost 100 million hectares in europe.The land damage accounted for 400 million h...
^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia, australia and europe, respectively. Overall, tree cutting, breeding and farm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44594594595 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82947798686 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0261136358 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.2 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208898795801 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165763094866 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142090881567 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165763094866 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142090881567 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.